gamerfreak
gamerfreak
  • Threads: 59
  • Posts: 3542
Joined: Dec 28, 2014
July 5th, 2026 at 1:55:31 PM permalink
Was playing 3 card poker on a cruise ship. Random comes up and asks if he can watch to learn the game.

I was doing ante/play only. I played my hand, and when the dealer revealed I knew I lost, and reacted by sighing and making a very subtle swiping hand motion.

The dealer took my chips without checking my hand, and the bystander was confused by why I “automatically” lost.

I said I didn’t automatically lose, the dealer was SUPPOSED to check my hand.

The dealer was in a mood to begin with, and snapped back and said I folded by making a hand motion.

I argued that hand motions mean nothing in 3 card poker. If I put chips on my cards that means I’m playing the hand, and only the hand matters, nothing else.

He said I was incorrect, and I folded by hand motion. So I just called it quits and colored out. The pit boss seemed to be watching the interaction and removed him from the table pretty quickly, but I was done anyway.

Who was right here?
Last edited by: gamerfreak on Jul 5, 2026
harris
harris 
  • Threads: 66
  • Posts: 711
Joined: Jun 30, 2025
July 5th, 2026 at 2:43:18 PM permalink
I think you were right
Hand motions only matter in blackjack and blackjack varieties, right?
charliepatrick
charliepatrick
  • Threads: 39
  • Posts: 3160
Joined: Jun 17, 2011
July 6th, 2026 at 1:54:30 PM permalink
^ I'm not sure. When various poker varieties were around (e.g. 5-card poker) some people did play blind (in which case they didn't know what they had); this was not totally unreasonable against Q-2 up-cards. In my local I think if you played two 3-card hands, one of them had to be played blind. However it was also quite common for people to raise with a bad hand hoping the Dealer would not qualify, so in this case they might wave their hand [in disgust!] when the Dealer qualified (in hindsight, some might have actually pushed the cards and bets towards the dealer).
commakaze
commakaze
  • Threads: 1
  • Posts: 3
Joined: Jan 8, 2025
July 6th, 2026 at 3:29:36 PM permalink
You put chips on your hand. The assumption should be you played it. If the dealer felt that it was unclear what you wanted, he should have asked. Just another example of a dealer who is "never wrong."
DJTeddyBear
DJTeddyBear
  • Threads: 218
  • Posts: 11202
Joined: Nov 2, 2009
Thanked by
harris
July 7th, 2026 at 1:16:07 PM permalink
Hand motions mean nothing. The dealer should check, primarily because a player might miss-read their hand.
I invented a few casino games. Info: http://www.DaveMillerGaming.com/ ————————————————————————————————————— Superstitions are silly, irrational, childish rituals, born out of fear of the unknown. But how much does it cost to knock on wood? 😁
smoothgrh
smoothgrh
  • Threads: 103
  • Posts: 2457
Joined: Oct 26, 2011
Thanked by
harrisodiousgambit
July 7th, 2026 at 1:30:11 PM permalink
Also, shouldn’t the pit boss be an advocate for a good customer experience? Or did you get the type who prefers to squeeze players short-term at the expense of long-term loyalty?
Dieter
Administrator
Dieter
  • Threads: 20
  • Posts: 7679
Joined: Jul 23, 2014
July 7th, 2026 at 8:19:39 PM permalink
Quote: gamerfreak

The dealer was in a mood to begin with, and snapped back and said I folded by making a hand motion.
link to original post



You could not have folded; folding is not an available player action after the play wager has been placed.

The dealer should have spread your cards for comparison like any other hand.
May the cards fall in your favor.
  • Jump to: